GrippeCanadaV3, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 000D19

What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.

Identifieur interne : 000D19 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000D18; suivant : 000D20

What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.

Auteurs : Catherine L. Mah [Canada]

Source :

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique [ 0008-4263 ]

RBID : pubmed:18615940

Descripteurs français

KwdFr :
- Canada, Grippe humaine (), Grippe humaine (immunologie), Humains, Personnel de santé, Politique de santé, Pratique en santé publique, Programmes de vaccination (législation et jurisprudence), Programmes obligatoires.
MESH :
- immunologie : Grippe humaine.
- législation et jurisprudence : Programmes de vaccination.
- Canada, Grippe humaine, Humains, Personnel de santé, Politique de santé, Pratique en santé publique, Programmes obligatoires.
Wicri :
- geographic : Canada.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Canada, Health Personnel, Health Policy, Humans, Immunization Programs (legislation & jurisprudence), Influenza, Human (immunology), Influenza, Human (prevention & control), Mandatory Programs, Public Health Practice.
MESH :
- geographic : Canada.
- immunology : Influenza, Human.
- legislation & jurisprudence : Immunization Programs.
- prevention & control : Influenza, Human.
- Health Personnel, Health Policy, Humans, Mandatory Programs, Public Health Practice.

Abstract

Policy decisions about public health services differ from those for personal health services. Both require trade-offs between such policy goals as liberty, security, efficiency, and equity. In public health, however, decisions about who will approve, pay for, and deliver services are often accompanied by decisions on when and how to compel individual behaviour. Policy becomes complex because different stakeholders interpret evidence differently: stakeholders may assign different weights to policy goals and may even define the same goals differently. In the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers, for example, proponents as well as opponents of mandatory vaccination may convey arguments in security terms. Those in favour of mandatory vaccination emphasize subclinical infections and duty of care (public security) while those opposed emphasize risk of adverse events (personal security). Proponents assert less worker absenteeism (efficiency) while opponents stress coercion and alternate personal infection control measures (liberty and individual rights/responsibilities). Consequently, stakeholders talk past each other. Determining the place of mandatory influenza vaccination for health care workers thus demands reconciling policy trade-offs and clarifying the underlying disputes hidden in the language of the policy debate.

PubMed: 18615940

Affiliations:

Canada

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Main, to step Corpus: 000811
to stream Main, to step Curation: 000811

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mah, Catherine L" sort="Mah, Catherine L" uniqKey="Mah C" first="Catherine L" last="Mah">Catherine L. Mah</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. catherine.mah@utoronto.ca</nlm:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Canada</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2008 May-Jun</MedlineDate>
</PubDate>
</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:18615940</idno>
<idno type="pmid">18615940</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000811</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000811</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000811</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000811</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000811</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mah, Catherine L" sort="Mah, Catherine L" uniqKey="Mah C" first="Catherine L" last="Mah">Catherine L. Mah</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. catherine.mah@utoronto.ca</nlm:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Canada</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0008-4263</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Canada</term>
<term>Health Personnel</term>
<term>Health Policy</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Immunization Programs (legislation & jurisprudence)</term>
<term>Influenza, Human (immunology)</term>
<term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Mandatory Programs</term>
<term>Public Health Practice</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Canada</term>
<term>Grippe humaine ()</term>
<term>Grippe humaine (immunologie)</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Personnel de santé</term>
<term>Politique de santé</term>
<term>Pratique en santé publique</term>
<term>Programmes de vaccination (législation et jurisprudence)</term>
<term>Programmes obligatoires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Canada</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="immunologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Grippe humaine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="immunology" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="legislation & jurisprudence" xml:lang="en"><term>Immunization Programs</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="législation et jurisprudence" xml:lang="fr"><term>Programmes de vaccination</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Health Personnel</term>
<term>Health Policy</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Mandatory Programs</term>
<term>Public Health Practice</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Canada</term>
<term>Grippe humaine</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Personnel de santé</term>
<term>Politique de santé</term>
<term>Pratique en santé publique</term>
<term>Programmes obligatoires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Canada</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Policy decisions about public health services differ from those for personal health services. Both require trade-offs between such policy goals as liberty, security, efficiency, and equity. In public health, however, decisions about who will approve, pay for, and deliver services are often accompanied by decisions on when and how to compel individual behaviour. Policy becomes complex because different stakeholders interpret evidence differently: stakeholders may assign different weights to policy goals and may even define the same goals differently. In the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers, for example, proponents as well as opponents of mandatory vaccination may convey arguments in security terms. Those in favour of mandatory vaccination emphasize subclinical infections and duty of care (public security) while those opposed emphasize risk of adverse events (personal security). Proponents assert less worker absenteeism (efficiency) while opponents stress coercion and alternate personal infection control measures (liberty and individual rights/responsibilities). Consequently, stakeholders talk past each other. Determining the place of mandatory influenza vaccination for health care workers thus demands reconciling policy trade-offs and clarifying the underlying disputes hidden in the language of the policy debate.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">18615940</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2020</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>05</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0008-4263</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>99</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><MedlineDate>2008 May-Jun</MedlineDate>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Can J Public Health</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>192-4</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Policy decisions about public health services differ from those for personal health services. Both require trade-offs between such policy goals as liberty, security, efficiency, and equity. In public health, however, decisions about who will approve, pay for, and deliver services are often accompanied by decisions on when and how to compel individual behaviour. Policy becomes complex because different stakeholders interpret evidence differently: stakeholders may assign different weights to policy goals and may even define the same goals differently. In the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers, for example, proponents as well as opponents of mandatory vaccination may convey arguments in security terms. Those in favour of mandatory vaccination emphasize subclinical infections and duty of care (public security) while those opposed emphasize risk of adverse events (personal security). Proponents assert less worker absenteeism (efficiency) while opponents stress coercion and alternate personal infection control measures (liberty and individual rights/responsibilities). Consequently, stakeholders talk past each other. Determining the place of mandatory influenza vaccination for health care workers thus demands reconciling policy trade-offs and clarifying the underlying disputes hidden in the language of the policy debate.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mah</LastName>
<ForeName>Catherine L</ForeName>
<Initials>CL</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. catherine.mah@utoronto.ca</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country>
<MedlineTA>Can J Public Health</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0372714</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0008-4263</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002170" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Canada</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006282" MajorTopicYN="Y">Health Personnel</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006291" MajorTopicYN="Y">Health Policy</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017589" MajorTopicYN="N">Immunization Programs</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000331" MajorTopicYN="Y">legislation & jurisprudence</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000276" MajorTopicYN="N">immunology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D037141" MajorTopicYN="Y">Mandatory Programs</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015980" MajorTopicYN="N">Public Health Practice</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18615940</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC6975919</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Can J Public Health. 2006 Mar-Apr;97(2):85</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16619990</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Healthc Pap. 2004;4(4):51-60; discussion 80-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15201530</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Aug;12(8):1238-41</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16965703</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1144-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16575733</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Can J Public Health. 2006 Mar-Apr;97(2):86-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16619991</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>J Law Med Ethics. 2001 Summer;29(2):121-30</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11508186</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Can J Infect Dis. 2000 Sep;11(5):225-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18159292</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>CMAJ. 2001 May 15;164(10):1447-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11387917</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1141-3</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16575732</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2005 Mar 18;23(17-18):2251-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15755605</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>N C Med J. 2004 Nov-Dec;65(6):323-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15714719</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>KY Law J. 2001-2002 Summer;90(4):831-90</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15868682</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Am J Public Health. 2003 Jan;93(1):20-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12511378</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Can Commun Dis Rep. 2006 Jun 15;32(ACS-7):1-27</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16805064</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Can J Public Health. 2002 Mar-Apr;93(2):101-3</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11968179</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference><Citation>Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Sep;18(9):779-83</Citation>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10493337</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Mah, Catherine L" sort="Mah, Catherine L" uniqKey="Mah C" first="Catherine L" last="Mah">Catherine L. Mah</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/GrippeCanadaV3/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D19 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000D19 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    GrippeCanadaV3
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:18615940
   |texte=   What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:18615940" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeCanadaV3

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35.
Data generation: Tue Jul 7 13:36:58 2020. Site generation: Sat Sep 26 07:06:42 2020

	Corpus GrippeCanadaV3
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Corpus GrippeCanadaV3

What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.

What's public? What's private? Policy trade-offs and the debate over mandatory annual influenza vaccination for health care workers.

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki